From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 11:19:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DBA1754; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AF03CAE; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1XTqmi-002gHT-CP>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:19:00 +0200 Received: from g225112153.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.225.112.153] helo=thor.walstatt.dynvpn.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1XTqmi-000JIM-8u>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:19:00 +0200 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:18:54 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: 11.0-CURRENT and Lenovo ThinkPad E540: No LAN, no WiFI Message-ID: <20140916131854.46acc5fb.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20140915233833.5bdd0725.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/6ZEYqHBKuQ_nyeKEg4PHtpN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 92.225.112.153 X-ZEDAT-Hint: A Cc: Kevin Oberman , FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:19:03 -0000 --Sig_/6ZEYqHBKuQ_nyeKEg4PHtpN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:25:34 -0700 Adrian Chadd schrieb: > Hi, >=20 > Try updating to the latest -HEAD. It at least makes dhclient behave bette= r. >=20 >=20 > -a >=20 >=20 > On 15 September 2014 18:19, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:38 PM, O. Hartmann > > wrote: > > > >> > >> Trying to install and run FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT > >> (FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20140903-r270990-memstick.img) on a new Le= novo > >> E540 notebook > >> fails in activating the NIC (Realtek RTL8111/8168B, driver re[0]). The= NIC > >> shows up as > >> active and with carrier when issuing "ifconfig re0". > >> > >> From a desktop machine, I tried to ping the system in question and I g= et a > >> result with > >> missing packets: > >> > >> ping: sendto: Host is down > >> ping: sendto: Host is down > >> ping: sendto: Host is down > >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D26 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.114 ms > >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D41 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.130 ms > >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D60 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.119 ms > >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D80 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.119 ms > >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D100 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.105 ms > >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D116 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.135 ms > >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D136 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.091 ms > >> > >> DHCP configuration fails, since no DHCP offer is discovered. > >> > >> I swapped the switches, the cabling and I had always the same results.= I > >> used another > >> Laptop, Dell Latitude E6510 with the same configuration (/etc/rc.conf)= and > >> that system > >> gets DHCP offer and is online. > >> > >> Since the notebook is brandnew, the last thing I'll "suspect" is a > >> defective NIC, so I'll > >> ask whether this phenomenon is known - or, if not, the results > >> definititely would > >> indicate a broken NIC. > >> > >> Another point is the WiFI adaptor. This notebook is supposed to have a > >> WiFi NIC, but it > >> doesn't get revealed by FreeBSD (I tried iwn/iwi without success). > >> > >> pciconf output below, sorry for the messy shape, it is a copy-and-paste > >> from that immature > >> vt() terminal. > >> > >> Has anyone successfully installed that type of Notebook with FreeBSD > >> CURRENT using NIC > >> and Wifi? > >> > >> Please CC me. > >> > >> > >> Regards > >> oh > >> > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> none1@pci0:3:0:0: class=3D0xff0000 card=3D0x502817aa chip=3D0x52= 2710ec > >> rev=3D0x01 hdr=3D0x00 > >> > >> > >> vendor =3D 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.' > >> > >> > >> bar [10] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xf1e00000, size 4096, = enabled > >> > >> > >> cap 01[40] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 > >> > >> > >> cap 05[50] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit > >> > >> > >> cap 10[70] =3D PCI-Express 2 endpoint max data 128(128) link x1(x1) > >> > >> > >> speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM L0s/L1(L0s/L1) > >> > >> > >> ecap 0001[100] =3D AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 0 corrected > >> > >> > >> ecap 0003[140] =3D Serial 1 00000001004ce000 > >> > >> > >> re0@pci0:4:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x502817aa chip=3D0x816810ec r= ev=3D0x10 > >> hdr=3D0x00 > >> > >> > >> subclass =3D ethernet > >> > >> > >> cap 01[40] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current > >> D0 > >> di sabled(L0s/L1) > >> > >> > >> cap 11[b0] =3D MSI-X supports 4 messages, enabled > >> > >> ecap 0001[100] =3D AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 4 corrected > >> > >> > >> > >> ecap 001e[178] =3D unknown 1 > >> > >> > >> class =3D network > >> > >> > >> cap 05[d0] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit > >> > >> > >> ecap 0003[140] =3D Serial 1 ac7ba1ffffa06fd6 > >> > > > > I can't comment on the WiFi, I have little Asus box using an 8111/8168B= and > > it works fine with the driver in 10.1-BETA. The driver in 10.0 recogniz= es > > the device, but did not work. I do notice that your NIC has a rev of 0x= 10 > > while mine is 0x0c. > > -- > > Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired In my local network (the laptop is working/getting installed in) I use jumb= o frames on several server system including the gateway (also FBSD CURRENT). After I manually set mtu > 1500 (in my case: mtu 6121) the NIC worked as ex= pected. My lab's Dell Latitude E6510 laptop (em0) works without setting explicit jumbo= frames. This is a kind of weird ... Thanks for your patience. Oliver --Sig_/6ZEYqHBKuQ_nyeKEg4PHtpN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUGByjAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8PVoH/1vTtuJ/DSZIuJQycl5jAIR5 Qgvc+pzXQUZvqxhX/lRVO3PC8Tv/AMa1cRBzgYbKWJ/0kJMzBSUlwRCuO1S2KDp8 YI+nIx6uycxKwQK6Y6Qn6wjsB0BhhccByJz6BtMaeEDmMcMQtuaLDMZTKTC07rdp kpVlYLQyiNyrav1Z9ysZw1BpbqutSkjrdCQS+gA/Qy6Bxp8NsCcxjNnpWGZFvww3 lw8Mt6xSRzBzIccoZN6HTuBZaegvKGQ9/thiW2CWwk3HIbtY32gIUoaBcbf7uyvc pIvVJoyGYJ3LgTN/c/lIBmJwLfb7DZ/IRS3NiiwWSGrcK37Ke1nRmkavaKJiHpI= =nBey -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/6ZEYqHBKuQ_nyeKEg4PHtpN--