From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 18:34:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A4C16A4CE for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:34:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5343743D2F for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:34:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (blackwater.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6423B2BD7F for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:34:38 +1100 (EST) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id B4A3751211; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:04:36 +1030 (CST) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:04:36 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Kirk Strauser Message-ID: <20040322023436.GD52612@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <405E3940.3080706@one-arm.com> <20040322012344.GB52612@wantadilla.lemis.com> <877jxd1uqa.fsf@strauser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q7MaAb+MMjzLKrXy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877jxd1uqa.fsf@strauser.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Top posting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 02:34:40 -0000 --Q7MaAb+MMjzLKrXy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday, 21 March 2004 at 20:27:57 -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > At 2004-03-22T01:23:45Z, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" writes: > >>> DO Unix mail clients have some option to config them to top post? > >> No. > > Kmail, for one, offers that as an option. I started doing that at work > after my boss explained that interleaved-trimmed posting is difficult to > read. I'm missing something here. Top posting, interleaved posting and bottom posting are not a function of the MUA, they're a function of the human making a conscious decision how to write a message. What do *you* mean? > I think the main difference between top- and interleaved-posting is > one of latency. In an office environment, when you're replying > within 2 minutes of receipt of a typically short message, top > posting is reasonable. Well, I'll concede that it could barely be acceptable under such conditions. > On Usenet and mailing lists, where you see large, complex questions > that get discussed over the span of days and weeks, interleaved > posting is the only format that remotely makes sense. Sure. Now how do you know in advance to which category each message belongs? Where do you draw the line? And what's the advantage of top posting? Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html Note: I discard all HTML mail unseen. Finger grog@FreeBSD.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --Q7MaAb+MMjzLKrXy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAXlC8IubykFB6QiMRAnqeAJ0VMlEF7TOgl9zQrrqYCIXPTZ16lACgo7d2 ftWb8JKzx4Uw1FhHxGBe3BE= =iNEL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Q7MaAb+MMjzLKrXy--