From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 13:12:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FDB616F49E for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:12:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [64.129.166.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DB613C48D for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:12:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.177.171.220] (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1LDCivf078513; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:12:44 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <45DC4550.4000001@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:12:48 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremie Le Hen References: <45D07407.500@freebsd.org> <20070212143827.GA88132@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070220190609.GM41451@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <20070220190609.GM41451@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/2617/Wed Feb 21 05:38:25 2007 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on mh1.centtech.com Cc: Ian FREISLICH , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Problem building various ports (dependencies). X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:12:57 -0000 On 02/20/07 13:06, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:38:28AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> See the email I sent to ports the other week. Also make sure your >> ports tree is up-to-date, yours looks like it's not. > > This maybe deserves an entry in src/UPDATING. Though is may seem > uncommon to tell people to upgrade their ports tree in this file, > not all -CURRENT users are reading -ports@. Something like: > > % objformat(1) has been removed. Since it used to be run by GNU > % Autotools, you must upgrade your ports tree to circumvent this > % issue. > > Regards, I didn't see a follow-up to this, so I just wanted to say I agree - it would save a lot of -CURRENTers a bit of pain.. It doesn't hurt anyway. Eric