From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Feb 28 13: 0: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51E637B803 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:00:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id NAA59401; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:00:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:00:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200002282100.NAA59401@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Will Andrews Subject: Re: ports/17034: update port: devel/kdevelop: 1.0 -> 1.1 Reply-To: Will Andrews Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/17034; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews To: "R. Imura" Cc: andrews@technologist.com, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/17034: update port: devel/kdevelop: 1.0 -> 1.1 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:53:27 -0500 On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 03:19:06AM +0900, R. Imura wrote: > > I think it should be a separate port. Not everyone wants documentation.. > > Ok, would you create the c++ reference port, too? > If you won't, that's ok. You can get rid of the documentation from > my port, anyway. Actually, now that I've gone and made a port of this, I realized a couple unsettling problems. So I've decided not to make this a separate port. I will generate a mechanism to install the documentation as requested, built into the devel/kdevelop[-i18n] ports. > They are used by EXTRA_PATCHES. > Ignore them. :) > Should be in 1.1. Ok. I will remove DISTFILES from your port, since it is no longer needed. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message