From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 16:30:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCFE16A41C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:30:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8876843D58 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:30:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j56GUAOt013677 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:30:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j56GU96g013670; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:30:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:30:09 GMT Message-Id: <200506061630.j56GU96g013670@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org From: Herve Quiroz Cc: Subject: Re: ports/81458: Update www/jakarta-tomcat5 to 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Herve Quiroz List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:30:10 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/81458; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Herve Quiroz To: Kang Liu Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, scott.balmos@utoledo.edu Subject: Re: ports/81458: Update www/jakarta-tomcat5 to 5.5 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 18:26:51 +0200 Hi Kang, On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:17:49PM +0800, Kang Liu wrote: > I think we'd better make tomcat55 as a new port, since it is not stable > enough for production server. I believe it would be better to repocopy tomcat5 -> tomcat55. Do you agree with that? BTW, I don't think DEPRECATED is the right keyword for a new, devel port. Speaking of devel ports, do you think "jakarta-tomcat5-devel" would fit better than 'jakarta-tomcat55"? The same goes for jakarta-tomcat4-devel. IMHO, looking at the descriptions of these ports, it seems to me like each branch has its own set of features that don't seem to be merged back. This would mean that they are not "-devel" branches. But I let the choice up to you, as I don't know very much about the distinction between versions. Herve