Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:46:50 +0100 From: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> To: Svatopluk Kraus <onwahe@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Subject: Re: panic td->td_lock == NULL in scheduler(), csup'd 2011-02-19 Message-ID: <CAJ-FndBjbh-KkLrSMgq9Fof=6af8LK6nrXtC%2Be4jeDEVDBEWUw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFHCsPXEfGQWt7xAKnoOtfPhvuMPGPjrmT8igqC4wW28jv-uSQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1206121910380.18441@multics.mit.edu> <CAFHCsPXEfGQWt7xAKnoOtfPhvuMPGPjrmT8igqC4wW28jv-uSQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2012/6/13, Svatopluk Kraus <onwahe@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > it looks similar to > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-March/023829.html Yes, that is likely the problem. However, I would really love to workaround the pid allocation race in another way than PRS_NEW because this imposes an extra-constraint, undocumented, on iterations of processes in the system. If you want to work on a patch for that, you are welcome to do so. Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-FndBjbh-KkLrSMgq9Fof=6af8LK6nrXtC%2Be4jeDEVDBEWUw>