From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 20:33:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780ACAAAA71 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:33:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F96B1FE6 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5780028438; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:33:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-86-49-16-209.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.16.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B9342842B; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:33:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <56C387B0.2070104@quip.cz> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:33:52 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman CC: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Removing documentation References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> <20160216155722.GA63934@neutralgood.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:33:59 -0000 Kevin Oberman wrote on 02/16/2016 20:44: [...] > I already see the looming battle over a future > replacement of the init system with something both more functional and > manageable. I think systemd went way too heavily toward "functional" and > ignored the manageable side. I hope FreeBSD does better, especially in > avoiding over-reach. > > I see much that I like (and a fair bit I don't) in launchd, for example and > I really need to keep a better eye on what NextBSD is doing. It is > certainly interesting and has some really good people working on it. I see "nosh" as really interesting replacement of init and rc.d https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2015-10-2015-12.html#The-nosh-Project http://homepage.ntlworld.com./jonathan.deboynepollard/Softwares/nosh.html It seems straight forward and I hope I will have time to test it soon. Miroslav Lachman