Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:11:13 -0700 From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Cc: juha@saarinen.org, joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD Message-ID: <20010626141113.C9911@freeway.dcfinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20010624023403R.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@osd.bsdi.com on Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 02:34:03AM -0700 References: <15157.11221.593513.478892@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> <00cf01c0fc40$c0348db0$0a01a8c0@den2> <20010624023403R.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 02:34:03AM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > As I said at the beginning, perhaps it's time to simply re-write the > Handbook paragraph which inadvertently "sells" -stable as a solution > for certain types of problems it was never meant to solve. Yes, the handbook paragraph was clearly written to suggest that if you run a production machine you should track -STABLE **in leiu of -CURRENT**, not as a general rule. That is, if you chose to track anything at all, it should be -STABLE. That should be easy to clarify. > - Jordan -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010626141113.C9911>