From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 28 16:10:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C691D1065686 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:10:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lichray@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADE28FC13 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaai12 with SMTP id i12so2966173eaa.13 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:10:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Oc54TGAsATqGtDJRyENTddoRhfZjzXmAdZgFgGr9074=; b=ee44l+FwBs37Dy5lV+EcAha09s3r4F0PKNEQPQmYac6ZuiKHnrc2WmrUzakvCWffM9 +RMY8YbV+bIO4ihafHmH5YvhacghvSsr8ybIFTiOITTtXXhilKEZ09183TRw9mfehXVe sva4b0d2jbPkSTJdkD9hW1oR6dqlvjGYV513M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.12.194 with SMTP id y2mr562700eby.86.1322495128401; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:45:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.47.193 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:45:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.47.193 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:45:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4ED3782D.70408@freebsd.org> References: <4ED2D061.5080309@freebsd.org> <4ED371F7.9000107@freebsd.org> <4ED3782D.70408@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:45:28 -0600 Message-ID: From: Zhihao Yuan To: Michael Scheidell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/161225: security/pam_fprint: Updates to the last git version X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:10:14 -0000 On Nov 28, 2011 6:01 AM, "Michael Scheidell" wrote: > > maybe mark BROKEN, not IGNORE? This won't be fixed, since it's not a problem. So just keep it IGNORE. > > can I include BROKEN in pam_fprint and fprint_demo if osversin < 800069? > > On 11/28/11 6:43 AM, Zhihao Yuan wrote: >> >> >> The problem has been discussed here www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/161224 < http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/161224> >> >> >> The thing is, we need libusb-1.0, what you referred in ports is 0.1x >> > I guess I am confused somewhat. its got me running in circles. > > libfprint only needs libusb on fbsd 7.x, right? It needs libusb-1.0, but the libusb in ports for stable/7 is libusb-0.1! > .if ${OSVERSION} < 800069 > IGNORE= libusb-1.0 is not avaible on FreeBSD < 8 > .else > CONFIGURE_ENV+= LIBUSB_CFLAGS=" " LIBUSB_LIBS="-lusb" > .endif > > > but in libusb, I see: > > .if ${OSVERSION} >= 800069 > IGNORE= has been already included into base system > .endif > > > should not the logic be, osversion < 80069 to include as a dependency libusb? > > or do we mark libfprint, and the two fprint programs BROKEN if osversion < 800069? > > > > -- > Michael Scheidell, CTO > o: 561-999-5000 > d: 561-948-2259 > >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation > > * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 > * Best Intrusion Prevention Product > * Hot Company Finalist 2011 > * Best Email Security Product > * Certified SNORT Integrator >