Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 08:42:57 -0400 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@freebsd.org>, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r313082 - head/audio/milkytracker Message-ID: <CAF6rxgnzbJYKavhnu0KMSkcjLSybJfMnwXwGRcX8bAtv1Va6rA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83_RNzUGY8s%2BbtgLxudumZY2LyMsZFRxwZxQvcz7HDo5gQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201302280854.r1S8spAK020926@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgnSLBUw9UodtvCJa4MzwUagWnj3h%2B04sDYvb7smW9D4mA@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83_RNzUGY8s%2BbtgLxudumZY2LyMsZFRxwZxQvcz7HDo5gQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17 March 2013 05:15, Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 17 March 2013 01:48, Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On 28 February 2013 03:54, Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> .if ${ARCH} == "powerpc"
>>> BROKEN= Does not compile on powerpc: fails in assembler
>>> +.else
>>> +BROKEN= does not build
>>> .endif
>>
>> Is it intended that this port eventually compile on powerpc? If not,
>> perhaps its best to use NOT_FOR_ARCH?
>
> NOT_FOR_ARCHS should be for ports that are designed not to work on an
> arch,
precisely.
Let me quote myself: "Is it intended that this port eventually compile
on powerpc?"
--
Eitan Adler
Source, Ports, Doc committer
Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgnzbJYKavhnu0KMSkcjLSybJfMnwXwGRcX8bAtv1Va6rA>