From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Aug 11 12: 1:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4884115658 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 12:01:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 74C101C0F; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 14:03:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662F5381F; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 14:03:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 14:03:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Satoshi Asami Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk update In-Reply-To: <199908100337.UAA42528@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Satoshi Asami wrote: > +.if !defined(EXTRACT_PRESERVE_OWNERSHIP) > + @if [ `id -u` = 0 ]; then \ > + ${CHMOD} -R ug-s ${WRKDIR}; \ > + ${CHOWN} -R 0:0 ${WRKDIR}; \ > + fi > +.endif Will this break non-root ports checkouts/builds. (Before someone says "Just define EXTRACT_PRESERVE_OWNERSHIP", I actaully just want to know if this will break, not how to fix it.) -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message