From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 21:54:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE2916A403 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 21:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from smtp2.syd.swiftdsl.com.au (smtp2.syd.swiftdsl.com.au [218.214.225.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7DA143D46 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 21:54:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: (qmail 9472 invoked from network); 13 May 2006 21:54:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blizzard.dnsalias.org) (218.214.144.129) by smtp2.syd.swiftdsl.com.au with SMTP; 13 May 2006 21:54:10 -0000 Received: by blizzard.dnsalias.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B0871E5; Sun, 14 May 2006 07:54:05 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 07:54:05 +1000 From: andrew clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060513215405.GA20439@ozzmosis.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: Has the port collection become to large to handle. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:54:11 -0000 On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 02:28:49PM -0400, fbsd wrote: > I for one think the port/package collection has already grown to > large to handle in it's present state. I suspect you are in the minority here. > Users are consuming massive bandwidth to download and it > consumes a very large chunk of disk space. No, a snapshot of the ports tree is only about 30 Mb. ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/ports/ I think you'll find cvsup's bandwidth usage is pretty minimal. Disk space is cheap. The ports tree decompresses to about 210 Mb. That's less than 0.01% of a modern ~$100 average-sized 80 Gb hard drive supplied with most desktop PCs. > Saying nothing about the wasted resources consumed to back it up > repeatedly. Unnecessary.