From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 04:12:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7400A16A424 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:12:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill.marquette@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE1843D46 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:12:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill.marquette@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i30so417815wxd for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:12:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ce5XYPAl0ueENGrFd8dsjbdlnnwaKyyxeRJUe9WfzfHQZJUpctRs0+NHJv4ix90pXZ6/BIG+rbbBcSdAIy1GYjY1CEObHeX8Y68GhylN4j9GxQFjIwK5ME+QUhf2TcD3ULU3NeDdZD9P3gZViBu23gGTUcnezJ71dXHy7tcA0wQ= Received: by 10.70.100.3 with SMTP id x3mr5401889wxb; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:12:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.89.11 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:12:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <55e8a96c0602252012l3e8d9e41oc5be3d3bdd1917a8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:12:55 -0600 From: "Bill Marquette" To: "Andrew Thompson" In-Reply-To: <20060226021826.GB2773@heff.fud.org.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <55e8a96c0602251445g68376abay3b58bec7f3160113@mail.gmail.com> <20060226021826.GB2773@heff.fud.org.nz> Cc: "freebsd-pf@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: HFSC issues in RELENG_6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:12:57 -0000 On 2/25/06, Andrew Thompson wrote: > You may want to test with another network card to verify that sis(4) is > actually working correctly with ALTQ. I am having ALTQ problems which > went away when using a xl(4) card. I am waiting for a sis card to arrive > in the mail so I can diagnose it further. You may be onto something here. I swapped my compact flash over to a Nexcom I have laying around with fxp nic's in it and so far haven't seen the same queue behavior with either the small test case or a full ruleset. --Bill