From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 9 04:59:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2275D16A4CE for ; Sun, 9 May 2004 04:59:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (mta7.pltn13.pbi.net [64.164.98.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD52943D5A for ; Sun, 9 May 2004 04:59:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (3c95954bba5a389aee4b10fac030ad98@adsl-67-115-73-128.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.73.128])i49BxPNk007897; Sun, 9 May 2004 04:59:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EAC96523EC; Sun, 9 May 2004 04:59:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 04:59:24 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Bob Perry Message-ID: <20040509115924.GA12479@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040509111602.GB14827@earthlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040509111602.GB14827@earthlink.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports Index Update Error - mail/lmtpd Failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 11:59:27 -0000 --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 07:16:02AM -0400, Bob Perry wrote: > > > > Was unsucessful at upgrading my ports system Saturday due to a > > > > failure during the port index update. More specifically, I > > > > received an error message stating that mail/lmtpd file failed. >=20 > Wanted tp provide an update. CVSup'd my system and upgraded the INDEX > (portsdb -uU). Everything went well. Did receive warnings of dup- > licate entries of two ports in the INDEX, but apparently nothing major. Yeah, that's expected when you have certain ports installed (e.g. gtk); some ports exist in multiple variants (e.g. with and without gtk support by default), but they detect the installed port and end up with the same name. It's harmless, so you can safely ignore it. > Thanks again for your support. Thanks for following up. Kris --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAnh0cWry0BWjoQKURAtTZAJ4hRfA9kwbOU9v9NeNoSJmMxpGLggCfTOO2 hIO7+oftfgPZ6aaLl5Z/0TU= =feUE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--