Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:01:44 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Mark Blackman <mark@exonetric.com> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org>, Avleen Vig <avleen@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound Message-ID: <863950mw53.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <8D942592-3662-4FBA-BA61-2A010452BF70@exonetric.com> (Mark Blackman's message of "Mon, 9 Jul 2012 22:47:59 %2B0100") References: <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org> <20472.51031.308284.775990@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <4FF8C890.9030408@FreeBSD.org> <CAMjP1KmVDJuKw09UFXb2M6QaL1dD1ocSjMOZLtjKiYFYoF9f4Q@mail.gmail.com> <4FFA7174.7050604@FreeBSD.org> <CAMjP1K=MahXEgHM-gKHFfDpQRDXY_0LGTn0JEE0Zm43%2Bh5jfPA@mail.gmail.com> <4FFA7980.4000707@FreeBSD.org> <CAMjP1K=b8mwqe31m=OqjUV%2BF=B85L4vpfT%2BDj00a1voPB-8TwA@mail.gmail.com> <D49E4B08-AC64-48C0-B918-94A7E30AB981@exonetric.com> <4FFB46A4.5050504@FreeBSD.org> <1E29121E-62B1-4929-BB7B-4FCA5D893F51@exonetric.com> <86a9z8mxa1.fsf@ds4.des.no> <8D942592-3662-4FBA-BA61-2A010452BF70@exonetric.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Blackman <mark@exonetric.com> writes: > I never use '-t' with dig. drill *told* me I should use '-t' then > completely failed to acknowledge I had done so. > > Marks-Macbook% drill -t www.google.com > [...] > ;; WARNING: The answer packet was truncated; you might want to > ;; query again with TCP (-t argument), or EDNS0 (-b for buffer size) So you got a truncated response and used -t, it didn't help, and drill printed the boilerplate warning message that it always prints when it gets a truncated response. I don't know about you, but I would call that a cosmetic nit. Unless, of course, you had tcpdump running while you did this and it turns out that drill sent a UDP request in spite of -t? It works fine (i.e. it uses UDP by default, and TCP when asked to) for me. I even tried the same nameserver you used, and was very surprised to get an answer. If you know the people who run it, you might let them know that it is inadvisable to process recursive queries from outside their own network. FWIW, the reply I got was not truncated. Perhaps there is a transparent DNS proxy somewhere between you and 178.250.72.130 - quite common with broadband CPE. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?863950mw53.fsf>