From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 25 2:41:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from workhorse.iMach.com (workhorse.iMach.com [206.127.77.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1476737B42C for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 02:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (forrestc@localhost) by workhorse.iMach.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA09557; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 02:41:40 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 02:41:40 -0600 (MDT) From: "Forrest W. Christian" To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: tom@sdf.com, abcjr@southwind.net, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Using 'private net' IPs for WAN Addresses In-Reply-To: <98411.969859778@verdi.nethelp.no> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 sthaug@nethelp.no wrote: > So you have only 50% utilization of the address space for your p-p links. > Unless you are very different from other providers, this is going to be a > very small fraction of your total address space. Plus, you can use IP unnumbered if you're REALLY concerned about this. - Forrest W. Christian (forrestc@imach.com) AC7DE ---------------------------------------------------------------------- iMach, Ltd., P.O. Box 5749, Helena, MT 59604 http://www.imach.com Solutions for your high-tech problems. (406)-442-6648 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message