From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Aug 25 19:21:06 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id TAA14219
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 25 Aug 1995 19:21:06 -0700
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA14213
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Aug 1995 19:21:04 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id TAA10889; Fri, 25 Aug 1995 19:20:29 -0700
Message-Id: <199508260220.TAA10889@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: current@freebsd.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
Subject: Re: Request for bumping OSRELDATE 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 26 Aug 1995 01:25:45 +0200."
             <199508252325.BAA06656@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 1995 19:20:29 -0700
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


  From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
  Subject: Re: Request for bumping OSRELDATE
  As Paul Traina wrote:
  > 
  > >No reaction?  If nobody objects, i would bump it to 199512 (certainly
  > >nobody would expect 2.2 before this point).
  > No, that's the whole point of the osreldate.  Bump it to TODAY please, and 
>>we
  > can always bump it again before we ship.
  
  Just to avoid misunderstanding: you mean i should make it 199508
  (or ...09) now?

Yes, exactly.  Make it 08, NEVER make it higher than "today".
  
  -- 
  cheers, J"org
  
  joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
  Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)