From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 25 12:19:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from smtp03.primenet.com (smtp03.primenet.com [206.165.6.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61EB37B698 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 12:19:12 -0800 (PST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp03.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA14599; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 13:16:23 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr08.primenet.com(206.165.6.208) via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpdAAAD5ayyC; Thu Jan 25 13:16:12 2001 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA27092; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 13:18:54 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <200101252018.NAA27092@usr08.primenet.com> Subject: Re: patch for bsd.lib.mk to create include and lib dirs To: roam@orbitel.bg (Peter Pentchev) Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 20:18:54 +0000 (GMT) Cc: clefevre@noos.fr, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20010124231628.A442@ringworld.oblivion.bg> from "Peter Pentchev" at Jan 24, 2001 11:16:28 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > would not be better to use install -d instead of mkdir -p which permit, > > if needed alsewhere, to also set ownership ? > > D'oh.. great idea! This simplifies things, because there's no need > for the sys.mk patch to define MKDIR; INSTALL is already defined. > > New patch attached. Question: are these changes using portable, or FreeBSD specific options? The reason I ask is because of www.openpackages.org... Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message