From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 16:20:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EEC16A4CF for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:20:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F9843D4C for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:20:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 77so227002rnl for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.83.11 with SMTP id g11mr2099814rnb; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.75.25 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff0408270920a9e694@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:20:06 -0500 From: Scot Hetzel To: Oliver Eikemeier In-Reply-To: <62D80202-F843-11D8-AC6A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <62D80202-F843-11D8-AC6A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> cc: dougb@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patch for mergemaster [was Re: RFC: Alternate patch to have true new-style rc.d scripts in ports (without touching localpkg)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Scot Hetzel List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:20:10 -0000 On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:08:51 +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Scot Hetzel wrote: > > > Attached is a patch to mergemaster that checks the script files for > > "$FreeBSD: src" during the STALE_RC_FILES check. If a script has such > > a header, it is assumed to be a stale rc file. The old behavior of > > checking all scripts is still available when the -s flag is specified > > to mergemaster. > > An alternate approach is in PR 64476: > > > But probably the "$FreeBSD: src" test is more useful, I'm not sure. > Anyway, you could post this as a follow-up, so that both approaches > could be compared. > OK, sent patch as follow-up to this PR. Scot