From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 23 05:28:52 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942D616A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 May 2004 05:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from genius.tao.org.uk (genius.tao.org.uk [212.135.162.51])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A0943D39
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 May 2004 05:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from joe@genius.tao.org.uk)
Received: by genius.tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100)
	id 9785F42B6; Sun, 23 May 2004 13:28:32 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 13:28:32 +0100
From: Josef Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Kay Lehmann <kay_lehmann@web.de>
Message-ID: <20040523122832.GF40899@genius.tao.org.uk>
References: <20040523101300.GA43113@genius.tao.org.uk>
	<40B09066.1020300@web.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3oCie2+XPXTnK5a5"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40B09066.1020300@web.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: portupgrade and daemons.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 12:28:52 -0000


--3oCie2+XPXTnK5a5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:52:06PM +0200, Kay Lehmann wrote:
>=20
> As far as I know this isn't the job of portupgrade. Normally it should=20
> be handeled by the port itself, which could stop daemons with=20
> appropriate set (de)install targets.
> I think a lot of the ports do this quite properly. Moving this to Mk=20
> looks quite complicated and I think it would be the best to leave it in=
=20
> the ports, since they should know what is required to do.
>=20

Ah ok.  That makes sense. Do you know of a port that does this properly
off the top of your head?

Joe
--=20
Josef Karthauser (joe@tao.org.uk)	       http://www.josef-k.net/
FreeBSD (cvs meister, admin and hacker)     http://www.uk.FreeBSD.org/
Physics Particle Theory (student)   http://www.pact.cpes.sussex.ac.uk/
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D An eclectic mix of fact an=
d theory. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

--3oCie2+XPXTnK5a5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkCwmO8ACgkQXVIcjOaxUBa01ACfYaBga9Kl82/meQ5zhsaztpwS
Lx8AoNKWJWIvZL/+zKu4yHhTGTEP5Ff0
=c83v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3oCie2+XPXTnK5a5--