From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 13 15:30:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC22B1065673; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:30:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from araujobsdport@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4788FC25; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:30:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so2575194pwj.13 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:30:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gkU+SeXfmuHjnHjs+kUqUP+XRty1rMnA9V+1fzZl0Tg=; b=SXgMoeOGi7uurOMj6ECh+3e9F2O6AElUbZDJCrgRbvMuWI0q7UHPcW38vF6EETaz+V dA4IVaDk4S2waM8Y8J18ejwurzuvLRloUZyTINlbCzAeAm55gQ5iiz8mP0qa28YtMZVR stZ1IUyjVN81+HKC0nJzEQ7+ZY1rUKotE6LcI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mDrcV26mIh8lFM+V1iT5k8LIXxRd9TWPPZ7v5sn2WbhyqbAjiszZbV8goQcHu13zqT 9VUglBRHfmd3Vs2U/+nHfgaoLnxUjCcEddOL9KdbkPPTFKIHOwu5mpznJNS02Z09miAJ GjL0eGkd9yi5qiJG+4DNXUITEIl/fgj7mEsmU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.194.15 with SMTP id r15mr14662651wff.274.1279035046550; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.205.209 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:30:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100713151205.GB95556@FreeBSD.org> References: <201007131351.o6DDpcmT044616@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100713144320.GA95556@FreeBSD.org> <20100713144735.GK48019@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20100713151205.GB95556@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:30:46 -0300 Message-ID: From: Marcelo To: Alexey Dokuchaev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, gahr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/gdcm distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:30:57 -0000 Another easier way to make sure is, just get the oldest distfiles and the new one, run a full diff and check what the output will show you. If case appears some big changes, do to contact the upstream maintainer and ask about. Regards, - Araujo 2010/7/13 Alexey Dokuchaev > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:47:35PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > On 2010-Jul-13, 14:43, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 01:51:38PM +0000, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > > > gahr 2010-07-13 13:51:38 UTC > > > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > > > Modified files: > > > > devel/gdcm distinfo > > > > Log: > > > > - Update distinfo (tarball rerolled) > > > > > > Per Project's bylaws, explicit acknowledgment of the fact that no > > > malicious changes were introduced in the updated distfiles is required > > > in the commit message. > > > > Sure, "tarball rerolled" was meant to do just that :) > > :-) Still, it usually doesn't hurt to ask upstream maintainer why > distfile was rerolled and reflect this in commit message, just to be sure. > > ./danfe > -- Marcelo Araujo araujo@FreeBSD.org