From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 6 16:28:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4729F16A4CF for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:28:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [128.30.28.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97AA43D54 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:28:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i96GS38g046164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Wed, 6 Oct 2004 12:28:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i96GS3eo046161; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 12:28:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 12:28:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200410061628.i96GS3eo046161@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Waldemar Kornewald In-Reply-To: <416415DA.9030109@web.de> References: <41640CEE.9070900@web.de> <4164106A.70901@cronyx.ru> <416415DA.9030109@web.de> X-Spam-Score: -9.9 () IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 cc: FreeBSD-net Subject: Re: modularization X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:28:05 -0000 < said: > Yes, something in that direction, plus: protocols: > IPv4, IPv6, TCP, UDP, ICMP, IPX, etc. > Just about everything as modules. It is not generally regarded as a good idea to make artificial boundaries between (e.g.) IP and TCP. -GAWollman