From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb  2 03:10:37 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE5A0760
 for <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>; Sun,  2 Feb 2014 03:10:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22f.google.com (mail-pd0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22f])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A80451607
 for <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>; Sun,  2 Feb 2014 03:10:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id w10so5692165pde.20
 for <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 19:10:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=0QG7Q7/S9Zv8uqxFcHRA1WDoJpXBlYhV/UMshUVWicI=;
 b=Dt9hhLNJrlzMELr9R8rNcH7MWZgt75WuzneWku5AJN29tYJyVviCHg2xIDL8NcsZri
 xxSkcwt7gP9AKEuK5ymAbF2WwGe62DHPEJJERCtogQ9j+kZu9q86g/etoseumabmNaEw
 NEWgur0gFzaZIXM/kMpYj1CmpScpCiN0VgxqoJCXSVOUQVb3yzDigTzrkFzXjei0uY2R
 rBkQ5NJbg0DOyC8Y8LnzTTgashDxeKIo1gFQHFJx/PoH5uhlGKvx+vpSD3wmdpB0or1q
 +afuyPnrr0H1tcVMFZupvmX0VGkcJNKGtkO+2TOOvN/3x9jOBBAu1xEf8I6/i66xJQud
 KxXw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.238.201 with SMTP id vm9mr29213432pbc.18.1391310637385;
 Sat, 01 Feb 2014 19:10:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.155.38 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:10:37 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:10:37 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGBxaXnOrL2SObPJemxzy+_+hr0fePoCKFrHG3Cr-R5t=+uNHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: some interesting observations on the relative performance of kvm vs.
 bhyve
From: Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>
To: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports."
 <freebsd-virtualization.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 03:10:37 -0000

I have 1 host that dual boots FreeBSD and Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS and bhtyve
seems to be atleast 3 or 4 times faster with disk I/O then kvm using the
most stripped down command lines I can come up with.

-- 
Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org