From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Mar 11  9:11:25 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA29C37B401
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:11:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from energyhq.homeip.net (213-97-200-73.uc.nombres.ttd.es [213.97.200.73])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFFC43F93
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:11:22 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from flynn@energyhq.homeip.net)
Received: from christine.energyhq.tk (christine.energyhq.tk [192.168.100.1])
	by energyhq.homeip.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E4D39AF5CA
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:11:21 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:12:26 +0100
From: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Should we have a lyx-qt slave port?
Message-Id: <20030311181226.05c23f07.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386--netbsdelf)
X-Face: 
 1j}k*2<FF@J5*`)_?pCn}ydC/PB|6|Y;HZ!6Z!%^'/H*.8V=9YjDc*mn6ypI'16$yA\IP}.
 j3e/`G#5U"1^bwTR6D1H*wPZm}8(ONGrl85Hx!;V^f#`]Xe]35]75HJ%3\J\<j4@V;3kd`C(L_6
 PA_
 sS\5f/c]-:)IF{uj[,!sdoNC?%ne5^:XGp9AG1(?gep3f}#;>E>Y\+C~E|/wehi[:dCM,{N7/uE
 3o#
 P,{t7gA/qnovFDDuyQV.1hdT7&#d)q"xY33}{_GS>kk'S{O]nE$A`T|\4&p\&mQyexOLb8}FO<q
 X<, @*v.fy*'PvzDPQK9iUGzU\
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.kL9iJ'b(h1w(Fg"
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

--=.kL9iJ'b(h1w(Fg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Seeing that quite some people seem to prefer the QT3 frontend instead of
the old xforms, one, should we have a slave port (lyx-qt) that defaults
to it? I'll have a go at it as soon as my FreeBSD box is back up.

Cheers,
-- 
        Miguel Mendez - flynn@energyhq.homeip.net
        GPG Public Key :: http://energyhq.homeip.net/files/pubkey.txt
        EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk
        Of course it runs NetBSD!
	Tired of Spam? -> http://www.trustic.com

--=.kL9iJ'b(h1w(Fg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE+bhj9nLctrNyFFPERAsDZAJ4y1mUrfeQDqJSVSAU16PoBA4XbdACgqsEg
FM45GtNZc406GWMjJo2mapc=
=cDgU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=.kL9iJ'b(h1w(Fg--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message