From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 9 21:03:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E5616A420 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 21:03:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com) Received: from mail-white.research.att.com (mail-red.research.att.com [192.20.225.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831F043D49 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 21:03:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com) Received: from bright.research.att.com (bright.research.att.com [135.207.20.189]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FC78551; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 19:27:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by bright.research.att.com (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id j97NR4BN032652; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 16:27:04 -0700 From: Bill Fenner Message-Id: <200510072327.j97NR4BN032652@bright.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: Joe Kelsey References: <200510071001.j97A1c23029414@freefall.freebsd.org> <1128726978.3009.63.camel@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 16:27:04 -0700 Versions: dmail (linux) 2.7/makemail 2.14 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfiles: shells/ksh93 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 21:03:56 -0000 Joe, >I can only assume that whatever script your test uses is somehow >incorrect. Based on feedback already received today, I'm planning on skipping the tests on any port that sets FETCH_ENV, FETCH_CMD, or has a do-fetch: target. I don't know how easy these will be to implement, so please bear with me. By the way, is it legally reasonable for the port to accept the pre-download license on behalf of the user? Bill