From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Dec  2 12:44:39 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mail1.toronto.istar.net (mail1.toronto.istar.net [209.89.75.17])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BDD37B400
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 Dec 2000 12:44:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d141-117-39.home.cgocable.net ([24.141.117.39])
	by mail1.toronto.istar.net with esmtp (Exim 2.02 #1)
	id 142JWs-00061F-00; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 15:45:06 -0500
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 15:51:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Dru <genisis@istar.ca>
To: Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org>
Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: natd, DHCP and W98 on LAN: The saga continues
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012021536380.60021-100000@www.bellnetworks.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012021547330.71156-100000@genisis.istar.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Jim Freeze wrote:

> On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Dru wrote:
> > 
> > Is Ethernet 0 a real (unused) NIC or some type of RAS, VPN, or dialup
> > stuff?
> 
> Dunno. I do have a TCP/IP Dial Up Adapter listed in the Network control
> panel.


If you don't use it, remove it as it will cause problems. However, you
seem to have a weirder problem on your BSD box as your NIC is using ARP's
broadcast address as it's MAC address (?!?)


> % dmesg | grep al0
> al0: <ADMtek AN985 10/100BaseTX> rev 0x11 int a irq 5 on pci0.11.0
> al0: Ethernet address: ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> al0: autoneg complete, link status good (full-duplex, 100Mbps)
> al0: promiscuous mode enabled

Having never seen this before, are both NICs on your LAN set for and
running at full-duplex? Does "dmesg" make a difference if you stop your
"tcpdump", as I think that's why the NIC is showing in promiscous mode.

Dru



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message