From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 24 08:34:14 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6ACB116A4CE; Mon, 24 May 2004 08:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2407043D45; Mon, 24 May 2004 08:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bms@spc.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1587C65211; Mon, 24 May 2004 16:33:48 +0100 (BST)
Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 55644-04-9; Mon, 24 May 2004 16:33:47 +0100 (BST)
Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (82-147-17-88.dsl.uk.rapidplay.com
	[82.147.17.88])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9902A651F7; Mon, 24 May 2004 16:33:47 +0100 (BST)
Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id E41AA6137; Mon, 24 May 2004 16:33:46 +0100 (BST)
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 16:33:46 +0100
From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20040524153346.GI90465@empiric.dek.spc.org>
References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040520162957.90528H-100000@fledge.watson.org>
	<Pine.GSO.4.60.0405241101151.9871@zeus>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0405241101151.9871@zeus>
cc: arch@freebsd.org
cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Network Stack Locking
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 15:34:14 -0000

On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> RW>- ATM -- Harti? :-)
> 
> Sure. At least netnatm, netgraph/atm and the various drivers. At one 
> point I want to get rid of netatm, so I don't want to put effort into
> netatm (just keep it working and compliling).

I second this. HATM has had its time, NATM is the way to go; it's much
more flexible.

Regards,
BMS