From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 3 10:30:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E0D1065673 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 10:30:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915C58FC1C for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 10:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcje9 with SMTP id je9so1011355bkc.13 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 03:30:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NNXrzgg3xNiOjnTzcF+KwHT05sRfDGxMcrdvMwKz5vc=; b=ciF9OwoQc/eO0MdpgKOlS23dbd3vZOYPNHK1fUQDhFcI5/SxIgHrqeS5BdnLOGEUBy sfrJn3tfIIGLvJINKiVoCKKOVCH9MCz6CI9j5f+zNbbbTGUlejVKptttpu7Bsn7fl75e HFfm4r2oKXwSwYUREyuXx+yiWmXk/CvEbDjyc6IexjanN1qjhRHr/uu3QcjfOzn0eVTS RoGV9buHzywv45xiPa6DD4ekYJSsc5Ner8OYbj5OhtkwQdgIM4oOOkiDAzHVihlM2Spk edXik/AtUUaae5RZSAV1Km6REbj7XC6tOgpw76iWwa83ANXbNoLxdyDxBsJHoM4zhF+V DN6w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.152.4 with SMTP id e4mr3534663bkw.2.1341311428245; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 03:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.49.87 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 03:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.49.87 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 03:30:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FF2B457.9030505@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4FF2B457.9030505@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:30:28 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: "Hartmann, O." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Sayetsky Anton , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice: X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:30:30 -0000 On Jul 3, 2012 10:00 AM, "Hartmann, O." wrote: > > On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote: > > I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow. > > I have both gstreamer and boost installed now. > > > > > We use FreeBSD 9.0STABLE and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT (both amd64). > > devel/boost-lib gets reeled in now by editors/libreoffice by default, so > it doesn't need to be installed explicitely. > > I saw a patch flushed in yesterday, submitted by bapt@. This patch also > installs LLVM/CLANG from the ports - with ASSERTS deactivated. > > I have on both systems, FreeBSD 9 and 10, LLVM/CLANG 3.1 as the standard > backend compiler, I guess this version has the suspected ASSERTS activated. > > Why another LLVM port? We already have LLVM/CLANG in the base system (9 > and 19). If the ASSERTS proble is the cause for breaks reported on the > list and elsewhere on the net, why isn't the maintainer still stuck on > the "old" version? > > I just managed it to install the prior version on broken systems and was > really lucky having LibreOffice working again. But the other day I was > bothered by the next non-working version and now I have lots of > notebooks remaining with NO LibreOffice on FBSD 9-STABLE. > > This is not what I expect from quality securing! It is simply a mess and > definitely another reason and point for the thread "Why NOT using FreeBSD". For anyone struggling with the new version of libreoffice, I made a package for 9/amd64. http://www.bayofrum.net/tb/packages/9-local/All/libreoffice-3.5.4.tbz Setting up a Tinderbox is easy, and will fix the problems you are having. Please heed advice before shouting and blaming about problems. Chris