From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Feb 11 06:41:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B6B228653 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 06:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@x86.ch) Received: from einstein.sui-inter.net (einstein.sui-inter.net [80.74.145.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.sui-inter.net", Issuer "DigiCert SHA2 Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48GtTw0sfSz4b6p for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 06:41:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@x86.ch) Received: from einstein.sui-inter.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by einstein.sui-inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7007EB1C0440; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 07:41:36 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: pass (einstein.sui-inter.net: connection is authenticated) Received: from [213.55.225.174] ([213.55.225.174]) by webmail.x86.ch (Horde Framework) with HTTPS; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 07:41:36 +0100 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 07:41:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20200211074136.Horde.uoO9uVx71HIGULsxJJY1f7a@webmail.x86.ch> From: freebsd@x86.ch To: bob prohaska Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RPI4 Install r357606 test 09.02.2020 failed References: <202002092026.019KQXLF021366@mail.karels.net> <4551CAE8-08DA-463F-876C-DD1BBAA5D7C5@bitblocks.com> <20200210192602.GA19140@www.zefox.net> <20200210200910.GB19140@www.zefox.net> <20200211011450.GD19140@www.zefox.net> <20200211024139.GE19140@www.zefox.net> In-Reply-To: <20200211024139.GE19140@www.zefox.net> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48GtTw0sfSz4b6p X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@x86.ch has no SPF policy when checking 80.74.145.25) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@x86.ch X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.55 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[174.225.55.213.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; IP_SCORE(0.30)[ipnet: 80.74.144.0/20(0.87), asn: 21069(0.57), country: CH(0.04)]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[25.145.74.80.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.18]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[x86.ch]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.900,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.35)[0.354,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[25.145.74.80.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:21069, ipnet:80.74.144.0/20, country:CH]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 06:41:42 -0000 hi bob for your information FreeBSD bsdrasp3 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT r343104 GENERIC  arm64   that runs perfectly on the rpi3b+ Zitat von bob prohaska : > Hi Klaus, > > I do appreciate your humor and share much of it, but also > have some sympathy for the poor sods chasing through the > archives trying to figure out what they're doing wrong. > BTDT > > Back around mid-summer the Pi3 was working extremely well. > It really looked like Tier 1 material. Then, I think in > roughly September, problems started cropping up. All > appeared to be software initially. I think most of them > _were_ software. At the time. > > Then I noticed a Pi2 acting up. Eventually it failed > completely, with a bad power supply. New supply, it's > fixed. Took a long time to sort that out. > > The Pi3 making mischief now is slightly younger than > the Pi2. Both have been powered on 24/7, mostly running > buildworld/kernel. Now the Pi3 is behaving suspiciously > like the Pi2. And, the supply voltage is at the lower > limit of acceptable. Didn't check when I got it, so > there's no basis for comparison. > > It may be that a sound objection to the Pi is poor > quality in little things like power supplies, cables > and connectors. > > Apologies if I'm belaboring the obvious.... > > bob prohaska > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-armTo > unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" for your information Links: ------ [1] http://www.zefox.net