From owner-soc-status@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 19 09:16:45 2013
Return-Path: <owner-soc-status@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: soc-status@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02316B81
 for <soc-status@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:16:45 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from qinchenchong@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ve0-x243.google.com (mail-ve0-x243.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::243])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B91042D9A
 for <soc-status@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:16:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ve0-f195.google.com with SMTP id m1so1289689ves.2
 for <soc-status@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=hj6dXxLXoBPh9lTKLm3MCAETE4W4Be4vgzVW8okctvg=;
 b=0sCVFbpWiL+mydT9ktSusbxlwdWosJfhdW1mkfghV0mkkaHzp7XulF5dWS7dRlQpfm
 ZbSZ7eoH2ff8V7hYIKog7z6GvXvRxzZOJMZfXa3OBS0lMgfLWE6gDlHQjt0Fdqdyef+k
 HhL6+BsVbuLZ21yWnqPVTRnpGwrbCvqeeWXv0f0LtO5TqgcaS+7UFMnoQ8fOlA4/8GjZ
 g2kqUuINYh93wFxzfOQDuUsMN9AU4XNz7I3hLe631UzjsguPYaoNCNOaZFaDPXRPNSbJ
 iGQpmDCKe3AdIXzhCEZdCaTz8UHjdDzJMQ9H9q/4d7FikNurc8COEZbA3LAtVtjiJHWN
 yPFw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.198.13 with SMTP id iy13mr12604622vec.11.1376903803831;
 Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.57.142 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:16:43 +0800
Message-ID: <CAFnsE3cNP9RZrq_5+Fdow5yNVtOfz5QjRJN6mvfwMzzkf1A--A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Weekly Status Report, Aug 19, 2013
From: Chenchong Qin <qinchenchong@gmail.com>
To: soc-status@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
X-BeenThere: soc-status@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Summer of Code Status Reports and Discussion <soc-status.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/soc-status>,
 <mailto:soc-status-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/soc-status>
List-Post: <mailto:soc-status@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:soc-status-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/soc-status>,
 <mailto:soc-status-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:16:45 -0000

Hi!

Here is last week's status.

* add a new struct, ieee80211_ratectl_node. This is the common state that
all per node rc
  state, i.e. ieee80211_[amrr|sample]_node, should contains it as the first
field. It's now used to
  store the capabilities. see below.
* rename ir_capabilities to irn_capabilities and move it to
ieee80211_ratectl_node (it contained in
  ieee80211_[amrr|sample]_node). ieee80211_ratectl is readonly, so
ir_capabilities can't be set.
  And, the capabilities is not a part of rc algo. It seems that it should
be put in the per node rc state.
  Interface of ieee80211_ratectl_node_init() and its callers  are updated.
References to ir_capabilities   are also adapted.
* add ieee80211_ratectl_[node_is11n|get_rateset] to the ratectl api. rc
algoes all need these
  functions.
* change the naming conversion of IEEE80211_RATECTL_FLAG_*.
* some errors fixed.

Thanks!

Chenchong