From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 1 15:40:00 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B3CED8998 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 15:40:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johannes-maria@t-online.de) Received: from mailout06.t-online.de (mailout06.t-online.de [194.25.134.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 591E87228B for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 15:40:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johannes-maria@t-online.de) Received: from fwd12.aul.t-online.de (fwd12.aul.t-online.de [172.20.26.241]) by mailout06.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D24741EA181 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:39:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from t-online.de (XL0X0BZUYh3+kngK9JKxlsG6toNKwC4tCkevhEv2A6k-ltxvBkymJboGwjh0VeVZDJ@[84.145.228.58]) by fwd12.t-online.de with (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) esmtp id 1ehGxl-3EDFmC0; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:39:45 +0100 Received: by t-online.de (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) johannes-maria@t-online.de; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:39:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:39:44 +0100 From: johannes-maria@t-online.de To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with upgrade and unable to build openjdk8 in poudriere Message-ID: <20180201153944.GA5998@localhost.org> References: <20180115151549.GA9923@localhost.org> <20180128130433.GA2196@localhost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180128130433.GA2196@localhost.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-ID: XL0X0BZUYh3+kngK9JKxlsG6toNKwC4tCkevhEv2A6k-ltxvBkymJboGwjh0VeVZDJ X-TOI-MSGID: 5edbf8d9-755f-4c7e-a7a3-289b2a119002 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 15:40:00 -0000 Hello, a supplementation to the first problem in my question to the list: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 04:15:49PM +0100, johannes-maria@t-online.de wrote: > First problem: > > One of the ports to install is x11/kde4 which as a dependency > adds java/openjdk8 to the list but poudriere seems to be > unable to build it: > =>> Failed ports: java/openjdk8:build > [excerpt from the log-file: > gmake[2]: *** No rule to make target '1'. Stop. > gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk8/work/openjdk/langtools/make' > ] > > And therefore > =>> Skipped ports: devel/antlr devel/kdesdk4 devel/poxml x11/kde4 > > On the other hand a direct make in ports/java/openjdk8 is successful > but it fails repeatedly when called by poudriere. I should have been a little bit more detailed: when I said > On the other hand a direct make in ports/java/openjdk8 is successful I meant the ports tree of the 11.1 basic system in /usr/ports > but it fails repeatedly when called by poudriere. and here poudriere used the tree /var/poudriere/ports (also 11.1). Both trees were updated at the same time and the files in java/openjdk8 were identical in both trees (except for 'work'). After the stop with error by poudriere I performed the make in /usr/ports/java/openjdk8 (not in the identical tree /var/poudriere/ports to not destroy any data for poudriere). Only now I tried a 'make' in poudriere's ports tree and this time I also got an error (as in the poudriere run). (And I repeated the make in /usr/ports successfully). I've no idea why a make in two identical ports differ so much. Best regards, Johannes-Maria