From owner-freebsd-current  Wed May 14 16:33:08 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA13654
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 14 May 1997 16:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA13647
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 May 1997 16:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id QAA17936; Wed, 14 May 1997 16:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch), current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: RELENG_2_2 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 14 May 1997 14:55:12 MDT."
             <199705142055.OAA28492@rocky.mt.sri.com> 
Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 16:33:18 -0700
Message-ID: <17931.863652798@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Mail locking, as already been said *many* times.  However, depending on
> usage, it may not bite anyone, or then again it might.  It's kind of
> like serving your mail spool over NFS, most of the time it works, but
> sometimes it totally corrupts your mbox.

But...  This changes *nothing* with mail locking in existing tools
and, as you've stated several times, you don't really care about
dtmail so its own [dys]function is not apropos!

I think you're the one who's failed to read this thread so far. :-)

					Jordan