From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 16 00:37:50 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900EB1065670
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:37:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA3D8FC1A
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:37:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192)
	id 5745F1A3C39; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:37:50 -0700
From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Message-ID: <20090316003750.GY55200@elvis.mu.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0903151520590.16993@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca>
	<20090315205229.GV55200@elvis.mu.org>
	<Pine.GSO.4.63.0903151702440.1646@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0903151702440.1646@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NFS version 4.0 for FreeBSD-CURRENT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:37:51 -0000

* Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> [090315 14:15] wrote:
> >
[[snipped but certainly appreciated]]
> >If the case is 4.1 is some number of years out, then I think my
> >answer is "let's get this in ASAP!", otherwise we should think
> >about it.
> >
> Yes, I think 4.1 is some years away.

That along with the fact that you stated, that everyone is shipping
4.0, means that it makes a lot of sense to proceed with your code.

Thanks very much for the summary.

-- 
- Alfred Perlstein