From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Oct 6 14:30:23 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA00389 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 14:30:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from attila.stevens-tech.edu (root@attila.stevens-tech.edu [155.246.14.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA00358 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 14:30:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wweng@attila.stevens-tech.edu) Received: from attila.stevens-tech.edu (attila.stevens-tech.edu [155.246.14.11]) by attila.stevens-tech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.3.1) with SMTP id RAA15322; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 17:29:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 17:29:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Wei Weng To: Andy Pendry cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is there anyhting better than uemacs In-Reply-To: <34395437.50B0@cableinet.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk ?? I am very new to freebsd but i know editor pretty well. :) (I guess) Xeamcs, vim, vile, nedit... they are all your choices. And they are all pretty. :) (pretty for editor. ^_^) you can use xemacs to do big programmign project, and use vim and vile to do some samll editing. (they are pretty handy) nedit looks like M$ crap pretty much. But it needs motif. ja ne ************************************************************ Wei Weng & A N NIIIM MEEEE * Box s-1398 & A A NN N I MM MM * Stevens Institute of Technology& A A N N N I M M MEEEE * Hoboken, NJ 07030 & AAAAAAAN NN I M M * wweng@stevens-tech.edu &A A NIIIM MEEEE * ************************************************************ On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Andy Pendry wrote: > Is there a better editor than uemacs for freeBSD? > > Cheers > > Andy Pendry >