From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Mon Nov 18 20:51:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00711C96E0; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:51:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-f54.google.com (mail-ot1-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47H1MY3KT5z4WY3; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:51:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 19so5879487otz.1; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 12:51:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h3yxSjgkzzP3yDf49s5RIuiAOfocPw9zXTkrcVGHz4c=; b=olD+IWYRbVMELq1x+PlTFDuQXVWKuwYDBoUQ0phHWvuCs20ZWqTOqGaUszb+fXpA/l 1P419eakmrvHBT1Yo1fTOxQ+55xWNYQKK2BST4fZtJN0f6WnbaMFi07S8BpOx/zzxhr8 4Gbebs+fHpMXjVlpxINkKH8CzugMzioCfINPnqo0t/W/bmAPINdtpPbrQF+Peni7zpk+ hCOlYyYLYHl71KfdZS47doDj3Cb64QktlZVvfrozZ29qR80qe5GaX7z9cpfLmJ6yZ9om kfnkFAm+pWAi9U/DXCw1NJCcBYmTlGUHqHCV2ck07xMhj5ra7yTDUG95RRDJoF3H/rC3 dkLA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUHsfZ/nHrbkX7E/RwaCzIfZNRK+K0LGFBA56eO6Wj735Ex5xDo g+nwg69JbOnzlS5bmu2AZxHNHEBTHD7pqnA7MY2F5gwa X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxDXmk7L/i+hpoOh716kd97+QzduZoYGL9DljpeVvcFhnIUEHUVZ2ARKLPnsuWHQAI5icn8FdaylYjv2soyxfQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1e0a:: with SMTP id s10mr971724otr.18.1574110279876; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 12:51:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201911181905.xAIJ5q6A068355@repo.freebsd.org> <20191118194501.GA43295@raichu> <20191118203529.GA64688@FreeBSD.org> <20191118204836.GB43295@raichu> In-Reply-To: <20191118204836.GB43295@raichu> From: Alan Somers Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 13:51:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r354824 - head/lib/geom/part To: Mark Johnston Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev , svn-src-head , svn-src-all , src-committers X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47H1MY3KT5z4WY3 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.92 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.92)[-0.921,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.996,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:51:21 -0000 On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 1:48 PM Mark Johnston wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 08:35:30PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 01:09:19PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:48 PM Mark Johnston > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:43:48PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:06 PM Mark Johnston > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Author: markj > > > > > > Date: Mon Nov 18 19:05:52 2019 > > > > > > New Revision: 354824 > > > > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/354824 > > > > > > > > > > > > Log: > > > > > > Fix grammar in gpart.8. > > > > > > > > > > > > PR: 241973 > > > > > > MFC after: 3 days > > > > > > > > > > > > Modified: > > > > > > head/lib/geom/part/gpart.8 > > > > > > > > > > Don't forget to bump the .Dd date. > > > > > > > > AFAIK we do not bump .Dd for such changes, only for content changes. > > > > > > Isn't that a content change? I thought anything displayed to the user > > > counts as a content change? > > > > I presume that "content" means more like semantic, functional changes > > that affect some particular meaning. Grammar fixes are just, well, > > grammar fixes and thus do not warrant .Dd bump. > > Indeed, this was always my understanding as well. I can't find a > concrete definition anywhere. I don't understand why it would be useful > as a user to see the date of the last "content change" if such changes > might consist only of a small formatting change or typo fix. > Ok, seems like everybody else is in agreement.