From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 13 06:19:07 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: perl@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C2D16A417; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 06:19:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from vegeta.p6m7g8.net (static-71-166-166-68.washdc.east.verizon.net [71.166.166.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E49C13C468; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 06:19:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from vegeta.p6m7g8.net (vegeta.p6m7g8.net [71.166.166.68]) by vegeta.p6m7g8.net (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9D5cfrV024312; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 01:38:41 -0400 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 01:38:41 -0400 (EDT) From: "Philip M. Gollucci" X-X-Sender: pgollucci@vegeta.p6m7g8.net To: linimon@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20071012062540.B45BF1CD27@mail.droso.net> Message-ID: References: <20071012062540.B45BF1CD27@mail.droso.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.90.2, clamav-milter version 0.90.2 on vegeta.p6m7g8.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on vegeta.p6m7g8.net Cc: perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently scheduled for deletion X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 06:19:07 -0000 On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, linimon@freebsd.org wrote: > Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: > > As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in > the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports > that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, > this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or > the cessation of development on the existing port. In some cases, > ports are marked for removal because they fail to build and install > correctly from their sources, or otherwise fail in operation. > > The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled > for removal, are listed below. If no one has stepped forward before > that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR), > the ports will be deleted. Hmmm... I missed that -- I think this module is still useful -- I will look at updating it. > expiration date: 2007-09-11 isn't that in the past ? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@riderway.com) 323.219.4708 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.