From owner-freebsd-security Thu Dec 7 6:16:22 2000 From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 7 06:16:20 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rookie.org (mail.rookie.org [212.43.72.181]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7EC37B400 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 06:16:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail.rookie.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C2332F805; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 15:17:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 15:17:03 +0100 From: Stephan Holtwisch To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TIS Firewall Tookit Message-ID: <20001207151703.A57521@rookie.org> References: <20001206081015.B61027@spawn.nectar.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from pm@aber.warum.net on Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 03:50:56PM +0100 Sender: dfens@rookie.org Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 03:50:56PM +0100, Manfred Petz wrote: > Accepted. Do you know a (free) alternative to FWTK which is comparable in > terms of ease of use, straightforward source and which implements similar > functionality (e.g. the permit/deny rules in netperm-table)? That depends on the proxy functions needed. The Juniper Firewall Toolkit (http://www.obtuse.com/juniper) looks promising, however i have not checked it yet. Besides, the smtp proxy of that Toolkit is part of the freebsd ports tree. Stephan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message