Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 15:01:44 +1000 From: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> To: "Herbert J. Skuhra" <herbert@gojira.at>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnutls requires unbound? Message-ID: <5bbe66f8-63e7-c3a4-f22d-c29be19502f1@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <87fswixfpw.wl-herbert@gojira.at> References: <4D1ABE1F-81B8-4111-85FB-ADE47F54C107@kreme.com> <87fswixfpw.wl-herbert@gojira.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14/07/2021 3:53 am, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 16:00:29 +0200, "@lbutlr" wrote: >> >> When updating gnutls, the port requires and installs unbound. This >> is despitee the fact that bind is already installed why is a second >> DNS server required for gnutls? Unbound is not running on the system >> (nor could it be, since the DNS ports are bound to bind). > > Yes libunbound.so is required, if you enable option DANE (off by > default). > > DANE_DESC= Certificate verification via DNSSEC > DANE_LIB_DEPENDS= libunbound.so:dns/unbound > DANE_CONFIGURE_ENABLE= libdane > > -- > Herbert > Can libunbound be shipped/packaged separately? Similar to libx264/x264 etc ? If so + 1
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5bbe66f8-63e7-c3a4-f22d-c29be19502f1>