From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Apr 19 12:21:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA04139 for chat-outgoing; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 12:21:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.konnections.com (mail.konnections.com [192.41.71.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA04131 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 12:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from castle (root@ip204.konnections.com [192.41.71.204]) by mail.konnections.com (8.8.3/8.8.3) with SMTP id NAA16533; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 13:20:06 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <335A792A.2D35F55@konnections.com> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 13:14:34 -0700 From: mike allison Organization: Publisher -- Burning Eagle Book Company X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.0 i486) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The Hermit Hacker CC: joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu, jkh@time.cdrom.com, chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Commercial, Non-Hacker CD Distribution - A thought References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The Hermit Hacker wrote: > Agreed...the other aspect is that if a product is compiled/ported > to BSD, it will make use of certain optimizations in BSDs libraries. > > So, StarOffice for Linux running under Linux would most likely be > 'faster' then being emulated under FreeBSD > > Marc G. Fournier Also, In a perfect virtual Unix world (where the name Gates doesn't appear in teh Phone book), a FreeBSD port could easily become a *BSD port meaning that it will run on over 14 architectures in a short period of time.... -Mike