From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 21 16:02:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0E516A422 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:02:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE00843D60 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:02:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anb (anb.matik.com.br [200.152.83.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1LG2m00006708; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 13:02:48 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 13:02:41 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200602210719.15683.joao@matik.com.br> <43FB3367.5060002@nurfuerspam.de> In-Reply-To: <43FB3367.5060002@nurfuerspam.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602211302.42179.joao@matik.com.br> X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (msrv.matik.com.br) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Martin Subject: Re: hostap with atheros unusable on releng_6? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:02:54 -0000 On Tuesday 21 February 2006 12:36, Martin wrote: > > RELENG_6 is the whole branch. What date has your kernel been built? > 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #2: Sun Feb 19 12:45:27 BRT 2006 sources are same date > I experience this when using 11g mode with hostap. The maximal > performance I've seen was about 2,5MB/s transfering a file. > But scp mostly gives up transfering large file and the log says > something about wrong MAC address. There are also large delays > sometimes and the average performance is a lot worse than in 11b > mode. > no problem at all, I get full througput in any mode as long as the device i= s=20 working, it is not a performance issue, it stops rx/tx > > Are you sure you don't have problems with DHCP or something like that, > when using 11b? > hum, what dhcp should have to do if the radio works or not? > > You're lucky. My wi(4) never worked properly (around 5.0R) and I gave it > back. I realized that FreeBSD hostap support wasn't stable at that time. > not all wi devices are capable to do hostap Jo=C3=A3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br