From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 12 06:39:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E1E37B401 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 06:39:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621B043F85 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 06:39:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jeff@jrpenn.demon.co.uk) Received: from jrpenn.demon.co.uk ([194.222.241.254]) by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 194LDs-0008W6-0W for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 14:39:13 +0100 Received: from jrpenn.demon.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jrpenn.demon.co.uk (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h3CDewkL009988 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 14:41:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jeff@jrpenn.demon.co.uk) Received: (from jeff@localhost) by jrpenn.demon.co.uk (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h3CDerE3009987 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 14:40:53 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jeff) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 14:40:31 +0100 From: Jeff Penn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030412134031.GA94973@jrpenn.demon.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200304120023.h3C0NtvN036040@server1.shellworld.net> <20030412053057.GB65034@gothmog.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030412053057.GB65034@gothmog.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Firewall Rules/connection troubles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 13:39:17 -0000 On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 08:30:57AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > h. You're blocking fragments. It's not always a good idea. Provided most rules use check-state, and the 'deny frag' rule follows the check-state rules, won't valid fragments be passed by dynamic rules?. Jeff