From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 2 16:20:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592AD106566B; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:20:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=489e84c9d=pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from ip-relay-002.utdallas.edu (ip-relay-002.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0637A8FC22; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:20:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: RELAYLIST X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,318,1249275600"; d="scan'208";a="15884696" Received: from smtp3.utdallas.edu ([129.110.20.110]) by ip-relay-002.utdallas.edu with ESMTP; 02 Sep 2009 10:51:33 -0500 Received: from utd65257.utdallas.edu (utd65257.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp3.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E33884EF4C; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:51:33 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:51:33 +0000 From: Paul Schmehl To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu , Alex Dupre Message-ID: <0B6596C6C29340D738A8A729@utd65257.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <20090902120508.2558236d@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <20090820023314.GF1295@hades.panopticon> <4A8CCC24.8050605@p6m7g8.com> <6B974976DD234EF08949F6A8@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <20090820164036.GA12998@hades.panopticon> <1250790054.45433.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20090821181232.GB59823@hades.panopticon> <1250882387.50625.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20090902031433.GA1304@hades.panopticon> <4A9E2505.1070306@FreeBSD.org> <20090902120508.2558236d@it.buh.tecnik93.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) X-Munged-Reply-To: Figure it out MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Dmitry Marakasov , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:20:25 -0000 --On Wednesday, September 02, 2009 04:05:08 -0500 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > In my case, over a few retries, switch is the fastest, followed by > surfnet. heatnet is only somewhere between 500-700K. > dfn, garr: and ovh fail. It might be way too much work for very little benefit, but network latencies being what they are, perhaps there should be a routine that runs periodically and adjusts the list according to some connectivity parameters? (Yeah, I know, easy for me to say. I don't have to write the code.) -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson