From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 00:51:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 52AD016A47E; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:51:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CA216A403; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:51:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9495043D88; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:48:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBB0n3QQ058971; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:49:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id kBB0n3hM058968; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:49:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:49:03 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob X-X-Sender: mjacob@ns1.feral.com To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek In-Reply-To: <20061210231839.GE12193@garage.freebsd.pl> Message-ID: <20061210164745.R58958@ns1.feral.com> References: <200612100554.kBA5sJpn089774@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061210231839.GE12193@garage.freebsd.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Perforce Change Reviews , Matt Jacob Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 111375 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthew Jacob List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:51:38 -0000 This was discussed at length some months back and the consensus with PHK and others was to do this at the GEOM level. If you don't mind, I'll look at yours. > On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 05:54:19AM +0000, Matt Jacob wrote: >> http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=111375 >> >> Change 111375 by mjacob@mjexp on 2006/12/10 05:53:25 >> >> Just to get it down... very first baby steps cut at the >> start of a multipath geometry class. > > Hmm, you are doing multipath GEOM class? > I already has a GEOM class which does dynamic multipathing and failover > at GEOM level. I thought this is incorrect way of implementing > multipathing. I think Scott was talking about doing it at the CAM > level AFAIR. > > Anyway, my code is in: > > //depot/user/pjd/geom_classes/sys/geom/rome/... > > -- > Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl > pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org > FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! >