From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Dec 24 08:13:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA15808 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 24 Dec 1997 08:13:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hwcn.org (main.hwcn.org [199.212.94.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA15784 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 1997 08:13:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hoek@hwcn.org) Received: from james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66]) by hwcn.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA09417; Wed, 24 Dec 1997 11:14:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA24941; Wed, 24 Dec 1997 11:14:48 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca: ac199 owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 11:14:47 -0500 (EST) From: Tim Vanderhoek X-Sender: ac199@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca To: Dmitrij Tejblum cc: Luoqi Chen , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: msdosfs win95 long file name support In-Reply-To: <199712240145.EAA02346@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Wed, 24 Dec 1997, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote: > already tested long file name support somehow. So I (as an user) would prefer > Wolfgang's work over your 2 weekend's work. Why change the "professional" > stuff for "homegrown"? For slight performance improvement plus some lack of It occurs to me that this all would have been quite unnecessary had vfatfs been stuffed down the throats of -current users as soon as it was mildly stable and usable. -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk