Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 03:43:25 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jeffrey Bouquet" <jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartmann@walstatt.org> Cc: "FreeBSD CURRENT" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "FreeBSD Ports" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ABI confusion: freebsd:12:x86:64 or ABI: freebsd:12:amd64? Message-ID: <E1dzKfd-0004KK-Ik@rmmprod05.runbox> In-Reply-To: <20171003105124.6b661017@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:51:24 +0200, "O. Hartmann" <ohartmann@walstatt.org> w= rote: > When using "poudriere", it seems ABI is freebsd:12:x86:64. When using Fre= eBSD base, it > seems always to be referred to FreeBSD:12:amd64. What now? All non-BSD wo= rld uses x86:64, > FreeBSD is using amd64, but why is this used inconsistently all over the = places? >=20 > I run into trouble setting up some package- and base-servers and ran into= the problem > when deleting - not thinking of this discovered inconsistency - some link= s on the servers > regarding FreeBSD:12:x86:64 (the same is for 11-STABLE). >=20 > Can someone shed some light onto this?=20 >=20 > What am I supposed to use now? The handbook referes to amd64, so I though= t poudriere > would, too.=20 >=20 > Thanks in advance, >=20 > oh > --=20 > O. Hartmann >=20 > Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder =C3=9Cbermittlung meiner Daten f=C3=BCr > Werbezwecke oder f=C3=BCr die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (=C2=A7 28 Ab= s. 4 BDSG). [ not using poudriere yet ] /me too I think three places [ etc/pkg, /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos, 2nd place in base= , ] fourth: hard coded DESPITE the above in the current DB in var/db/pkg? fifth: derived somehow from uname -a? here: freebsd:12:x86:32 ... when this issue resolved, could it please be added to 'man pkg|poudrier= e|syntch|portmaster?|portupgrade? [ the latter two when developed further = ]'=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1dzKfd-0004KK-Ik>