From owner-freebsd-doc Wed Jan 23 7:50:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE6537B405 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 07:50:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0NFo2g53513; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 07:50:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 07:50:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201231550.g0NFo2g53513@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: From: Peter Pentchev Subject: Re: docs/34184: Document "sysctl variable=/dev/foo" syntax Reply-To: Peter Pentchev Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/34184; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Pentchev To: Thomas Quinot Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/34184: Document "sysctl variable=/dev/foo" syntax Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:41:04 +0200 On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 04:31:43PM +0100, Thomas Quinot wrote: [snip] > > .Dq no device . > > That's nroff wizardry to me ;) Not quite nroff, simply mdoc(7) :) > > Other than that, looks fine to me. > > OK, here is an updated patch: This one looks fine, at least to me. G'luck, Peter -- The rest of this sentence is written in Thailand, on To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message