Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:05:05 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon <yongari@kt-is.co.kr> To: Chris Flecknell <cflecknell@systemrage.org> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NIC Drivers Message-ID: <20040802070505.GE1384@kt-is.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <20040802063047.659331A6A9@mx1.systemrage.org> References: <200408020420.i724KNBR041846@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040802063047.659331A6A9@mx1.systemrage.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 02:30:46AM -0400, Chris Flecknell wrote: > Random question, > > Is there any advantage of using an xl(3com) NIC vs. the built-in HME NIC on > an Ultra10? Or vice versa.. > Personally I don't see much advantage over hme(4). atm, the only plus is in xl(4)'s checksum offload capability.(IMO) However, hme(4) will have checksum offload capability too in near future. In addition, due to bugs of 3Com chips in some revisions, xl(4) now disabled TX checksum offload capability. fxp(4) has one nice feature that mitigates interrutp load on host cpu via loadable microcode. But I don't know that feature works on sparc64. In hme(4) we can reduce TX interrupt load with minor patch too. Unfortunatly, that yielded performance drops(serveral percentage) in netperf TX test. Regards, Pyun YongHyeon -- Pyun YongHyeon <http://www.kr.freebsd.org/~yongari>;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040802070505.GE1384>