From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 6 15:56:45 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB62F626088 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 15:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x72b.google.com (mail-qk1-x72b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FbdVh5P04z4pJ3 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 15:56:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x72b.google.com with SMTP id o5so5421767qkb.0 for ; Thu, 06 May 2021 08:56:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=QYOcwzdH98M4PTxiAzC682Jdcmaq9eAFbJIEIdr/FE4=; b=P7YKvwPKNtVLyXNUyBdhmSnBnmcgsp+4HR9YMf4jtoQq22cr8+3psRRBTFYHhuMEi9 Ydpupw5q8lQKTpMu262M4nxKWH6cIanGykMVjh5NgPbeNJ+rqz+s0JoqA1o6VkcqhFDX YFPRTft5XGV3kGX7Pp38tMmvZlVWXzuYPRA2sPZ42jOENoOWLsMJtBmBWz6LkB76gr7Z X9X3NPT831t3Ka6bna1N0UTeN+GEdG8wgAZnPyfEPKqgJv8tufoo8QZGhduSyF4ax22b Szu3voP6q8pahACyWoZc0nv3EIdqxu1eNXZgEl5sFUO1cNjspod6ieEPf+JHUQtGIdGA kiIg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=QYOcwzdH98M4PTxiAzC682Jdcmaq9eAFbJIEIdr/FE4=; b=b7VYQpXhi2VXdlAP8wVWQZzdn5RxdgopNef3ySelOJM2UVTNBndtN9/Ngge1LpIcyd R37ZuHa94nzZnceIzxNbrumaNYJBiRZd/R+bX2STEGap7MmlB1/m+AFkl5ESfR+gFW+/ /0wnr7FX8lrKKZ8N/p0UmFGnGgn+kvVoQy54q1fJzanU24ljjV88udUTq9y/cXdjoCET HPuI+QL2ZO9N17aO4qcoi9wpvWnW06GehAzIqeIAepeStvdjjq6kt08Gq28PsrfdtTPt /WR5+In24OBzAJYXW68o2nqXMgmAjkmYLh2AkqP3d58t26hMisBqnJ/ynhc1KajYAuIF ZU/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mQhfCY2Ez/471HLqerbhNeW27PJZCUNnBy1rIyeD6wiOdizI8 w9xtiZchPI1HpBTdH8oF7vU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5+sfmxIO6AZRRKcuU7RJBoov/F+Drd6xuEDJtg1Rg1g5dG5JQiWaWjpIsfXWu4axLrGrSKA== X-Received: by 2002:a37:42d3:: with SMTP id p202mr4599012qka.456.1620316603430; Thu, 06 May 2021 08:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nuc ([142.126.164.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p187sm2422804qkd.92.2021.05.06.08.56.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 May 2021 08:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Mark Johnston Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 11:56:44 -0400 From: Mark Johnston To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D6zkan?= KIRIK Cc: "Andrey V. Elsukov" , FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: IPsec performace - netisr hits %100 Message-ID: References: <50cfc0e6-5cc6-7004-2566-bc06428d4394@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FbdVh5P04z4pJ3 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=P7YKvwPK; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of markjdb@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=markjdb@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.48 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.78)[-0.777]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[markj@freebsd.org,markjdb@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[markj@freebsd.org,markjdb@gmail.com]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b:from]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[yandex.ru,freebsd.org]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 15:56:45 -0000 On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 05:07:30PM +0300, Özkan KIRIK wrote: > I wonder that if you received the flame graphs ? Yes, there's nothing obviously problematic there. > I also tested system with multiple if_ipsec interfaces using different > source-dst tunnel address. > By this way, system can utilize all cpu cores. > But for single if_ipsec interface, is there a way to speed up transfer ? Did you see Andrey's comment regarding the MTU on the ipsec interface?