From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 22 14:48:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED4A16A42A for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:48:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro@varnet.biz) Received: from relay00.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.5.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DD1A43D92 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:48:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro@varnet.biz) Received: (qmail 45729 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2005 14:48:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO phobos.mars.bsd) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 22 Nov 2005 14:48:15 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 200.115.214.28 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:48:55 -0300 From: Alejandro Pulver To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051122114855.5970964f@phobos.mars.bsd> In-Reply-To: <20051121212519.GA7444@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051121163721.60580f01@phobos.mars.bsd> <20051121211004.GA15250@soaustin.net> <20051121232023.5ed476db@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20051121212519.GA7444@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.7; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: bsd.wx.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:48:45 -0000 On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:25:20 -0500 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:20:23PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:10:04 -0600 > > linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) wrote: > > > > > > .warning "FreeBSD versions prior to 5.x do not support > > > > Unicode" > > > > > > Some of them don't support .warning, either :-) > > > I have removed it. > > > Other than that it looks pretty good. My only concern is with a > > > few short variable names (_UC) that might conflict with names > > > used in ports themselves? Perhaps I'm just being paranoid. > > > > Or perhaps we need something like KNOBS with reserved words ? > > That would be too complicated. System components like bsd.*.mk should > just stay away from simple variable names that might be used > elsewhere. > > Kris > I changed it into _WXUC and _WXUCL (now all internal variables start with _WX). I have uploaded a new version. Thanks to all of you for your suggestions. Best Regards, Ale