From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Jul 15 4:22: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF2915175 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 04:22:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id EAA66290; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 04:20:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 24D3314D65; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 04:18:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <19990715111822.24D3314D65@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 04:18:22 -0700 (PDT) From: ggm@dstc.edu.au To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0 Subject: i386/12649: hosts.allow requires entry for BOTH tcpd and telnetd in 'tcp_wrapped' inetd. Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Number: 12649 >Category: i386 >Synopsis: hosts.allow requires entry for BOTH tcpd and telnetd in 'tcp_wrapped' inetd. >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Jul 15 04:20:01 PDT 1999 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: George Michaelson >Release: 3.2-STABLE >Organization: DSTC pty/ltd >Environment: >Description: we have hosts.allow allowing telnetd, but all:all:deny at end. without tcpd:all:allow, the telnetd entry is not adequate to permit inbound telnet. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: it may actually be a documentation bug, relating to how tcpd is or is not needed in inetd. Sorry for lack of clarity. Is this a parasitic interaction between the two methods (inetd-integrated, and tcpd as daemon invoking telnetd) or is this a genuine bug, or is this a simple mis-configuration? >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message